Friday, 22 December 2017

Paris – the heart of the global revolts of 1968 because of the students

1968 was the year that all the tension from the global impact of the American civil rights movement, Third Worldism and the Vietnam War came to a head. Although it was a global revolt, it was different in different countries therefore must be looked at on a national and local scale too. In this post I will focus on the revolt by students in Paris. Gilcher-Holtey highlights why Paris could be argued as being at the heart of the global revolt as although, ‘The May movement in France did not start until international developments had reached their peak. Within a few weeks, it caught up with other movements in terms of mobilization and then surpassed the German and American protest movements in its political explosiveness’.[1]


Firstly, what was going on for young people in the 1960s in Paris? In 1906, Paris had a student population of 15,000 but by 1968 there were 160,000. During this same time period, the average age of menstruation fell from 17 to 12 and the average age of marriage rose because of better food and quality of life but this led people sexually frustration. 


Secondly, what were the reasons the Paris students felt their only option was to revolt? Students had to put up with horrible conditions with packed classrooms and little facilities and the length of time it took to get a degree had increased. Therefore, it would only be worthwhile if they would get a job at the end of it but in 1968, 52 percent of students were afraid of not getting a job after they graduated. This satisfaction and fear led them to take drastic action. 


It first began in Antony before 1968, when the male and female students were not allowed to mingle at night so in 1962 the residents destroyed a lodge that allowed security to control visits to the female halls. The security guards then started to target the African men which sparked a mass occupation in protest. Eventually this led to the directors tolerating men sleeping over in January 1966 and in November 1967 all the halls of residence in Paris followed suit. 


This sparked the students of Nanterre to also take action so in March 1967 male students occupied the female halls of residence. However, the minister of education refused to consider changing the rules. Matters dramatically deteriorated when in the French government proposed cuts to places and make the selection more rigorous for the school year of 67-68 (they wanted to have less working class students, the people they believed to be the trouble makers). This caused the students to launch the largest strike in the history of the university. On 6 May 1968, 20,000 students gathered in the Latin Quarter to protest against the chancellor with each night getting worse. On the night of 10/11 May 1968, the police assaulted the barricades using tear gas. 400 people (including 274 police) were injured and over 521 protestors were arrested. Of the 521 protestors 54 percent were not even students which suggests how important the fight was for ordinary young people not just students. 


What did the students achieve? Of the 160,000 students in Paris at the time over half of them were involved in some way in the May ’68 movement this suggests its importance. It also led to the National Assembly passing the university reform legislation in November 1968. 


Protests are still being used today to help students to get reform. This was evident when students held a march in the streets of London in November 2017 to protest against the funding for university education.[2]

By Alethea Coalwood



[1]Ingrid Gilcher-Holtey, ‘France’ in Klimke, Martin and Joachim, Scharloth. 1968 in Europe: A History of Protest and Activism, 1956-1977 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 111-124 (p. 111).


[2] Harrison Jones, ‘London student march calls for rich to be taxed to fund free education’, The Guardian, (15 November 2017), https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/nov/15/london-student-march-calls-for-rich-to-be-taxed-to-fund-free-education (accessed 22 December 2017).

The Birmingham Riots - as seen through photographs

In order to understand the context of photographs from the Birmingham Riots of 1963 it is important to know the background of the events. Birmingham was one of the biggest segregated cities in the South and racism was so bad that it was nicknamed ‘Bombingham’. This made it a prime place for King’s organisation and the local civil rights movement to begin a campaign to desegregate the city. The purpose as stated by King himself was for ‘Our direct action programme to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation’.[1] It was an economic boycott, illegal marches, sit-ins, picketing and an effort to ‘fill the jails’.  

Before discussing the individual photographs, it is crucial to consider that each image can be used in so many different ways, it is dependent on which view you take. There is no one tale for the photographs as it is directly linked with your perspective of the riots and the civil rights movement. 



There are positives to this photograph as it suggests that there was no-one causing any violence and there is a sense of union with them holding hands, an idea of being stronger together with unity across the genders. On the other hand, there are negatives as against the large crowd they look defenceless. It looks disorganised, therefore the white supremacists would be happy as there are only three of them which makes them look weak. 



This photograph suggests that the attempt to fill the jails was successful and they look relaxed and innocent. Because of their smiles it is not immediately obvious that they were in jail (the jails became so full that they had to use the schools), you have to know the context. They are smiling because they have done their job. Nevertheless, there are negatives because it is a posed photograph because there is a purpose behind it. They wanted to show everyone that they are not weakened by being arrested, it was all part of their plan. From a white supremacist perspective it makes a mockery of the justice system, a negative for them. 


This is very different to the previous two images as it suggests the violence of the Birmingham Riots. The white supremacists would be able to use this to their advantage and manipulate the situation in the media, by saying ‘Look what they look like, they’re animals, biting people, and they're monsters’. However it is important to look at the opposite perspective. The woman biting could be protecting herself. She looks defenceless and she must have been very desperate to resort to biting. 




This is a positive photograph for the civil rights movement as the young guy looks calm and sure of his position, with the police having to use violence against this strong man. However the white supremacists could have used this to their advantage by saying no-one in the background is looking at them so are they really that strong? There are several perspectives to this photograph as on the one hand it looks as though the police are using the dogs for violence but on the other they could be attempting to pull the dog off of the guy. Also this photograph does not capture a possible situation going on to the left of the image.


Photographs are an effective source as they are able to capture specific moments in time but this is also a disadvantage as they are only a snapshot. These images add to our understanding of the Birmingham Riots and add different points to our perspectives based purely just on the facts of the events.
 

By Alethea Coalwood


[1] Martin Luther King Jr., Letter from a Birmingham Jail, 1963.