Thursday 20 February 2020

Alcatraz - It's Other History


Alcatraz - It's Other History
The 1960s is known as a decade filled with protests and activism, however this focuses on campaigns such as the Civil Rights struggle, Vietnam or Women’s liberation. Alongside this there were other issues developing such as the plight of the Native Americans. With a long history of injustices against them, Native Americans have often been the subject of forced relocation as America expanded and wanted to claim their land. This was no different in the 1960s, as from the 1950s they had begun to relocate them from their reservations in an attempt to claim further land from them.[1] This resulted in the movement of many Native Americans to the San Francisco Bay Area, where up to fifteen to twenty thousand lived by the mid-60s.[2] Their concentration there generated unrest as they felt they were being ignored and many promises from the government were broken. Taking inspiration from the protest movements of the 1960s, on 20th November 1969 fourteen Native Americans chose to stage a protest and take hold of the island of Alcatraz.[3] It represents another fight for equality that had been taking place throughout the century, but was given adequate media coverage and attention in the 1960s, raising awareness for their situation and feeding the popularity of the protest.

On the 21st March 1963 the infamous Alcatraz prison closed.[4] It was not until 1973 that it would open its doors as a tourist attraction, but today it receives around one million visitors a year.[5] Alcatraz has been depicted within popular culture numerous times through films such as Birdman and The Rock featuring Nicolas Cage and Sean Connery. However, none of the common images of Alcatraz depict history that Native Americans share with the island.

Located off the coast of San Francisco, the small island was originally home to a US Army fortress, built in the early 1850s to protect the bay during the Gold Rush era.[6] It was used by the military to house prisoners in the 1800s, but did not become home to a federal prison until 1934 when it was handed over to the Department of Justice for that purpose.[7] Its location meant that it was used to hold maximum security prisoners who would receive ‘minimum privileges’ and it was seen as inescapable, but this did not stop the 36 men who tried to escape during the 14 attempts that were made.[8]
After the site was closed it was abandoned with many suggestions brought forward for regeneration of the site. But in 1969 it was declared ‘Indian Land’, which would be used to create a Native American cultural and educational centre.[9] There had been previous attempts to claim the land for Native Americans in 1964 and again on 9th November 1969, but the lack of media coverage and public attention meant that it went by mostly unnoticed.[10] However, it did inspire the later activists, who took action after the San Francisco Indian Centre burned down earlier in 1969.[11] By 1971 the government removed the American Indians from the island as the organisation fell into disarray and there were increasing problems within the campaign. Therefore, while it was not a successful movement in terms of creating a base for their culture and history, it did raise awareness of their plight and struggle against the government.

Last year they began their celebrations to mark the 50th anniversary of the occupation of Alcatraz.[12] Through nineteen months of special events ending in June 2020, mirroring the nineteen months they occupied the island, and an exhibition titled ‘Red Power on Alcatraz, Perspectives 50 Years Later’ , they have raised awareness and ensured this event has not been forgotten.[13]

By Fyona Cunningham



[1] Troy R. Johnson, The American Indian Occupation of Alcatraz Island Red Power and Self-Determination (United States of America: University of Nebraska Press, 2008), p. 8.
[2] Ibid., p. 9.
[3] Sherry L. Smith, Hippies, Indians, & the Fight for Red Power (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 85.
[4] ‘Alcatraz’, Federal Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/about/history/alcatraz.jsp (last accessed 12th February 2020).
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Smith, p. 86
[11] Ibid.
[12] ‘American Indian Occupation – 50th Anniversary’, National Park Services, https://www.nps.gov/goga/red-power-on-alcatraz.htm (last accessed 12th February 2020).
[13] Ibid.

Tuesday 11 February 2020

My Lai: American Hypocrisy- By Fraser Brown


In 16th of March 1968, one of the worst atrocities to place during the Vietnam War, known as the My Lai Massacre. The unit known as Task Force Barker, led by a Lieutenant William Calley, moved into the small village of Tu Cung and by the afternoon, over 300 innocent people were killed, mostly women, old men and children. It is important to keep in mind that these villagers’ were all South Vietnamese, who you would expect the Americans to see as allies, and had no affiliation with Viet Cong members1. However this is not the reason to why this Massacre is so gruesome, as there have been plentiful of times in war that innocent civilians were murdered, no, this event is much worse than that. The reason being is that the gang- raping and mutilations of some of the women and children’s bodies2. Here lies the hypocrisy of the American value of the 1960s, of being the ‘leader of the free world’. America entered the Vietnam war in the attempt to ‘help’ countries combat communism and provide there with assistance to achieve this. When the massacre ended and the troops came back to America not one of the Task Force bar one was sentenced in any way at all. That one who was sentenced was the very Lieutenant William Calley and he only ended up serving a mere three years under house arrest. This whole event feels unjust as, even when the news about what happened became public, no one was punished deservedly. Even when he was originally sentenced to life, the public felt that this was unfair due to Calley being the only one singled out 3. However the problem with this is that it appears to show the some American values are flawed due to the fact that they see a man being sentenced for life as unjust but at the same time this also implies that they don’t see his and his teams actions in Vietnam as unjust.

In conclusion, the My Lai has to be one of the most significant atrocities that America played a part in. Not only did it show the true hypocrisy of America fighting for 'freedom but it also resulted in the murder of the innocent has always has of course always happened but never to such a disgusting level by a First World democracy. The main thing that was learnt is the utter hypocrisy that was acted by the American government. These events might be awful and terrible but it is important that for America to continuing to spout in its rhetoric that they are the 'leader of the free world' and the most democratic country, then they must learn to put those claims into action, so events like My Lai do not happen in the future.
1Oliver, Kendrick (17th April 2006) The My Lai Massacre in American History and Memory, Manchester University Press
2BBC News (20 July 1998) Murder in the name of war- My Lai
3Katz, Andrew (17th Aug. 2013) Field of Dishonour: Famous American Court-Martials: Lieut. William Calley, TIME



Sit down and fight for your rights: The power of peaceful protests-  
By Fraser Brown

Throughout the history of America, to fight for ones rights has meant two different actions, either to take direct action by violence and force, or to protest in a non- confrontational way. The reason for this blog is not to suggest that one is better than the other, both have their pros and cons, however with direct action it is easy to see how affective it can be, but there is a subtle quality with peaceful protest that show not only the power peaceful actions can have in gaining rights but also the power of the impact it can have on the public.

To start, we should take a look at the protests in the 1960s and what combination of effect they had on the Civil Rights movement in the years to come. On the 1st February, 1960, four students in North Carolina walked into a Woolworth store in Greensboro and sat down in the lunch counter and were refused service, but remained anyway. Now the question is why this is so significant. The reason being is that what come showed a great example of the power people hold. The next following day, the sit-ins continued, each day adding more and more people joined the protest, with over three hundred protesters by the fifth day1.  Concluding with a massive boycott and resulting in a change in segregation laws for in these establishments. What is most significant about this is the simplicity of this act in retrospect and the impact it had on a larger scale. The fact that, in a matter of days, the four original protesters were able to inspire a large group of people shows the effect that peaceful protest can have on society. After this, more and more students all over North Carolina, as shown in a news article a week after explaining the impact of the sit-ins, causing some stores to close2.

It is important to remember that there is no right way or wrong way to protest, only violent action, which considering the time was justified and nonviolent resistance. I am in no way saying that peaceful protest is more appropriate or better than direct action, appropriately stated by Charles Evers “Non-Violence won’t work in Mississippi... if a white man shoots a Negro in Mississippi, we will shoot back”3.  Sometimes violence is the only option to further a movement, but it’s the message that peaceful protest gets across to a public viewing. With violence people see both sides fighting with each other so there is nothing shocking about it, but when one side is calm and collected and the other side is the aggressor, it creates a striking image that can be extremely impactful to the public. This might have made people more sympathetic to the movement as well, due to the fact that even when the protesters are treated wrongly, they continuing with their protest without retaliating. In conclusion, throughout American history, a peaceful protest has been viewed as a simple way to get a message across, however I believe that a peaceful protest is more than this, it is an effective way to not only get  a message across to the majority, but also a way of getting the majority to support your message.
1 Library of Congress, Greensboro Lunch Sit-ins retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/odyssey/educate/lunch.html
2 :in reference to a news paper article on Wednesday, 10th February 1960 archived From
3Umoja, Akinyele. Omowale (2013) We Will Shoot Back: Armed Resistance in the Mississippi Freedom Movement, NYU Press, pg.126


Motown- When America gained its Soul- By Fraser Brown
If there is one word that is most people associate as being one of the most influential and lasting impact on the music industry, alongside that of rock n’ roll, has to be Motown. Motown was not just a Record Label from Detroit; it was more than that, a sub movement during the time of Civil Rights, Motown not only made a name for itself in America, but all over the world. Motown Records was first founded on the 12th of January, 19591 and made its major start during the 60s. Not only did Motown produce a number of famous singers and groups, but it also helped and made an impact on American society and the Civil Rights Movement. As stated in an article by Christina Pomoni “Music echoes social change and such it bears the weight of the expression of the people”.2 

Motown wasn’t just some American Record label that produced a number of well known singers, it was a statement to America and the World that a change was happening in America and that new change is that black Americans will be in the spot light as an equal with white people. It symbolised the change in social values in the American public, the impact was not that Black artists were no
longer a rarity, but they were actually popular and sought after. The 1960s produced a number of Black artists that were and continued to be praised for their contribution to the American music industry, such artists and groups include, the Supremes (who included Diana Ross), the
Four Tops and the Jackson 5 and singers such as Stevie Wonder and Marvin Gate who were apart of the Tamla label3
Not only was it the record label themselves that showed a changing America and a counter to the racial inequality and chaos of America, the artists and their songs also gave a way to express the unrest that many African Americans felt during the time. Take the song R.E.S.P.E.C.T, by Aretha Franklin who expressed the demand for Civil Rights4.This truly shows the massive impact that Motown really had on America. It had one aspect which was the massive influence on music throughout the 60s and into the late 70s, leading to difference genre such as R&B, Country, Jazz and Pop. It also had the more important influence on the Civil Rights movement as well providing another way to express African Americans struggles and wants and in some aspects, another form of protest.
To conclude, Motown had a huge impact in the 60s, not only towards the music industry but also in society itself, changing the way America views Black artists and groups. Motown also shows the real power music can have on society, similar to the influence of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X in America, Motown gave way to another possibility of hope to many young, African American children and teenagers, so that they could look forward to the future they would inevitably grow up in. 
1Cruz, Gilbert, Jan. 12, 2009, A Brief History of Motown, TIME
2Pomoni, Christina (10th Oct. 2009) The Social Impact of Motown Music on American Culture, https://psychedelichippiemusic.blogspot.com/2009/10/social-impact-of-motown-music-on.html 
4Schoonmaker, James (2015) Motown: Its True Impact on the Civil Rights Movement, Manchester Historian