Tuesday 29 November 2016

The United States; defeated in war by it's own public?

In the past two centuries The United States has emerged as an undisputed global superpower. America’s military might has proved unrivaled. There is an exception to this notion. The Second Indochina War, otherwise known as ‘Vietnam’. The conflict which waged from 1955- 1975 ended with what many consider a victory to the North Vietnamese ‘Viet Cong’ army.  Was the biggest enemy however the citizens of the United States itself? A strong argument could be made that defeat also came from the hands of its own people.
As with any conflict, there is no sole reason to a victory or defeat.  The effectiveness of the Viet Cong’s ability to instigate ‘Guerrilla’ warfare tactics played a central part. On the contrary, the lack of success of America’s ‘Search and Destroy’ missions demoralized its own troops and pushed people to Viet Cong sympathy. Despite this as will become apparent, domestic discontent was just as greater threat to success than the army the United States was fighting.

As a nation usually united at times of war, Vietnam stands as anomaly. The reality of war was now impossible to conceal due to media coverage. The siege of the US embassy was broadcast nationally. Atrocities such as Ben Tre, which saw an entire city flattened, and the Mai Lai massacre of 400 civilians were covered extensively. Rumours emerged from the later incident that women and children were raped[1]. For many citizens this undermined their belief of military intervention to uphold good. Disenchantment grew from an already widespread view that the conflict held no geographical importance or direct threat. Another reason for this was the rising death toll, announced nationally daily. By 1967 10,000 men had died.  People began to lose faith in a seemingly pointless war of attrition at the cost of their loved ones. Economic affects were also beginning to arise. Vietnam cost the American taxpayer an estimated $150billion[2]. Furthermore, money was being retracted from proposed poverty programmes in favour of war resources. It was even calculated that in 1968, an average of $322,000 was spent on every dead Viet Cong. In comparison to $53 on people in programmes[3]. Domestic discontent snowballed.  From many sectors of society an organised anti-war movement began.  Businesses, the church and students began denouncing the continuation of the conflict. One of the nation’s largest forms of information, The New York Times refused to support its military. It instead proposed immediate withdrawal. Students across the country occupied Universities in protest and burned military draft cards. In fact the 30,000 who attended ‘Stop Draft’s Week’ directly impacted President Nixon’s scrapping of ‘Operation Duck Neck’[4]. A campaign which would have lead to an invasion of the Northern territories.  Ultimately, high mortality rates and economic repercussions formed a widespread anti-war movement. A movement materialized of considerable magnitude impossible for the establishment to ignore.

 As a democratic republic the United States has a duty to listen to its public. The difficulties in maintaining a conflict without a democracies full backing are clear. On the flip side, if domestic voices encouraged the conflict, Vietnam may have had a different outcome. Instead the voice of dissent grew deafening. In 1975, The United States withdrew all troops. The evidence could suggest that it was the army of the anti-war movement which inflicted defeat upon their own military.


[1] Isserman and Kazin, ‘America divided, the civil war of the 60s’, 2004, Oxford University press
[2] Chafe. H, William, ‘The unfinished journey’, 1995, Oxford university press
[3] Isserman and Kazin, ‘America divided, the civil war of the 60s’, 2004, Oxford University press
[4] Joseph. L. Galloway, ‘who was at fault for America’s failure in Vietnam?’, online article, 1998

No comments:

Post a Comment