Watching this scene almost fifty years after its
release, I still get goosebumps. After all, can you imagine how groundbreaking
this must have been at the time? At the height of a decade ‘haunted by
black-white confrontations’[1], In the Heat of the Night had white
audiences ‘cheering’ for the black man.[2] No
small feat by any stretch of the imagination.
Similar to what Chuck Berry, Fats Domino, and Little
Richard had achieved in the 1950s, Sidney Poitier’s performance as Virgil Tibbs
broke down the perceived barrier of race for many. Where people overlooked the
colour of these artists and simply enjoyed the rock ‘n’ roll, many looked
beyond the colour of Sidney Poitier’s skin and simply enjoyed his performance.
Instead of seeing a Negro, they saw Mister
Tibbs: a human being no different to you or I.
At its heart, the film is about the emotional
journey taken by two men. More specifically it depicts the evolution, almost
enlightenment, of one man’s views towards another race. These men are Virgil
Tibbs, an African American police detective from Philadelphia, and Bill
Gillespie, the white police chief of Sparta, Mississippi.
The association between the two begins when Virgil
is wrongly arrested (I might add at gunpoint) for the murder of a wealthy white
industrialist. Of course, because Virgil is a black man with money, his guilt
is automatically assumed. ‘What d’ya hit him with?’ asks Gillespie upon their
introduction at the station.[3] ‘Coloured
can’t earn that kind of money.’[4]
Not
a great start then.
Upon the realisation of Virgil’s detective status,
the two are forced to work together where a mutual respect begins to blossom. Gillespie
goes from a place of sheer hatred towards Virgil to saving him from a lynch mob
and sharing a drink with him at his house. Gillespie has evidently undergone an emotional
transformation. His perceptions of Virgil and race have clearly been altered.
This is not to say that Gillespie has been ‘cured’
of his racism so to speak. No, this would be too clean-cut for a film that
deals with such a serious issue. It would serve to brush-off southern racism as
an issue that was easily solved. Despite an apparent fondness growing towards
Virgil, Gillespie continues to make racist remarks throughout. Even in the most
poignant of moments such as the aforementioned drink
they share, Gillespie addresses Virgil as ‘black boy’.[5] In doing so, In the Heat of the Night creates a realistic depiction of just how
entrenched racism was in the South, while at the same time suggesting there was
potential for change.
The message of the film was one of harmony then, ‘that
colour was less important than the quality of the human being.’[6] Released
at ‘the height of the long, hot summers’ which saw 250 African Americans killed
‘in nearly 300 race riots between 1965 and 1968’, this message had never been
so crucial.[7]
[1]
Lester
J. Keyser, Andre H. Ruszkowski, The
Cinema of Sidney Poitier: The Black Man’s Changing Role on the American Screen,
(San Diego: A. S. Barnes & Company, Inc., 1980), p. 105
[2]
Mark Harris, Scenes from a
Revolution The Birth of a New
Hollywood, (Edinburgh: Canongate Books Ltd., 2008)
[3]
Norman Jewison, In the Heat of the Night,
1967
[4]
Ibid.
[5]
Ibid.
[6]
Lester J. Keyser, Andre H. Ruszkowski, The Cinema of Sidney Poitier, (San
Diego: A. S. Barnes & Company, Inc., 1980), pp.111-112
[7] Emma Hamiltin, Troy Saxby, ‘“Dragging the
Chain”: Linking Civil Rights and African American Representation in The Defiant Ones and In the Heat of the Night’, Black Camera, Vol. 3, No.1, (2011), pp.
75-95, (p.90)
[8]
Norman Jewison, In the Heat of the Night,
1967
No comments:
Post a Comment